2 lines
3.5 KiB
JSON
2 lines
3.5 KiB
JSON
{"affected":[{"affectedData":[{"product":"JBoss Enterprise Application Platform","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"EAP 6.4.21"}]}],"source":"secalert@redhat.com"}],"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"2BF03A52-4068-47EA-8846-1E5FB708CE1A","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_data_grid:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"CD354E32-A8B0-484C-B4C6-9FBCD3430D2D","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"B8423D7F-3A8F-4AD8-BF51-245C9D8DD816","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:6.4.21:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"5B9B368A-C894-4D7A-8E64-4B12DDE572E5","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"72A54BDA-311C-413B-8E4D-388AD65A170A","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"0952BA1A-5DF9-400F-B01F-C3A398A8A2D4","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_enterprise_application_platform:7.3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"8B157A2D-3422-4224-82D9-15AB3B989075","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_application_runtimes:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A33441B3-B301-426C-A976-08CE5FE72EFB","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:single_sign-on:-:*:*:*:text-only:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"341E6313-20D5-44CB-9719-B20585DC5AD6","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"cveTags":[],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"The issue appears to be that JBoss EAP 6.4.21 does not parse the field-name in accordance to RFC7230[1] as it returns a 200 instead of a 400."},{"lang":"es","value":"El problema parece ser que JBoss EAP versión 6.4.21, no analiza el nombre de campo de acuerdo con RFC7230[1] ya que devuelve 200 en lugar de 400"}],"id":"CVE-2020-1710","lastModified":"2026-06-17T03:02:15.287","metrics":{"cvssMetricV2":[{"acInsufInfo":false,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","cvssData":{"accessComplexity":"LOW","accessVector":"NETWORK","authentication":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":5.0,"confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"PARTIAL","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","version":"2.0"},"exploitabilityScore":10.0,"impactScore":2.9,"obtainAllPrivilege":false,"obtainOtherPrivilege":false,"obtainUserPrivilege":false,"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","userInteractionRequired":false}],"cvssMetricV31":[{"cvssData":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":1.4,"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary"}]},"published":"2020-09-16T15:15:12.457","references":[{"source":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":["Issue Tracking","Vendor Advisory"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"},{"source":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Issue Tracking","Vendor Advisory"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793970"}],"sourceIdentifier":"secalert@redhat.com","vulnStatus":"Modified","weaknesses":[{"description":[{"lang":"en","value":"NVD-CWE-Other"}],"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary"}]}
|