Files
vuln-cve/data/2026/41xxx/CVE-2026-41583.json
T

125 lines
5.4 KiB
JSON

{
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"cveMetadata": {
"cveId": "CVE-2026-41583",
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"state": "PUBLISHED",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-21T14:15:21.959Z",
"datePublished": "2026-05-08T14:55:50.120Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T19:42:57.297Z"
},
"containers": {
"cna": {
"title": "ZEBRA: Consensus Divergence in Transparent Sighash Hash-Type Handling",
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-573",
"lang": "en",
"description": "CWE-573: Improper Following of Specification by Caller",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.3,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0"
}
}
],
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-8m29-fpq5-89jj",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-8m29-fpq5-89jj"
}
],
"affected": [
{
"vendor": "ZcashFoundation",
"product": "zebra",
"versions": [
{
"version": "zebrad < 4.3.1",
"status": "affected"
},
{
"version": "zebra-script < 5.0.2",
"status": "affected"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T14:55:50.120Z"
},
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.1 and prior to zebra-script version 5.0.2, after a refactoring, Zebra failed to validate a consensus rule that restricted the possible values of sighash hash types for V5 transactions which were enabled in the NU5 network upgrade. Zebra nodes could thus accept and eventually mine a block that would be considered invalid by zcashd nodes, creating a consensus split between Zebra and zcashd nodes. In a similar vein, for V4 transactions, Zebra mistakenly used the \"canonical\" hash type when computing the sighash while zcashd (correctly per the spec) uses the raw value, which could also crate a consensus split. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.1 and zebra-script version 5.0.2."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-8m29-fpq5-89jj",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
}
},
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"type": "ssvc",
"content": {
"timestamp": "2026-05-08T19:42:41.730920Z",
"id": "CVE-2026-41583",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment",
"providerMetadata": {
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-08T19:42:57.297Z"
}
}
]
}
}