253 lines
12 KiB
JSON
253 lines
12 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"containers": {
|
|
"cna": {
|
|
"affected": [
|
|
{
|
|
"product": "lodestar",
|
|
"vendor": "ChainSafe",
|
|
"versions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"status": "affected",
|
|
"version": "< 0.36.0"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"descriptions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "en",
|
|
"value": "Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus."
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"metrics": [
|
|
{
|
|
"cvssV3_1": {
|
|
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
|
|
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
|
|
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
|
|
"baseScore": 7.5,
|
|
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
|
|
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
|
|
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
|
|
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
|
|
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
|
|
"userInteraction": "NONE",
|
|
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
|
|
"version": "3.1"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"problemTypes": [
|
|
{
|
|
"descriptions": [
|
|
{
|
|
"cweId": "CWE-190",
|
|
"description": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound",
|
|
"lang": "en",
|
|
"type": "CWE"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"providerMetadata": {
|
|
"dateUpdated": "2022-05-24T14:15:14.000Z",
|
|
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
|
|
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
|
|
},
|
|
"references": [
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_MISC"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_MISC"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"advisory": "GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
|
|
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
|
|
},
|
|
"title": "Integer Overflow in Lodestar",
|
|
"x_legacyV4Record": {
|
|
"CVE_data_meta": {
|
|
"ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
|
|
"ID": "CVE-2022-29219",
|
|
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
|
|
"TITLE": "Integer Overflow in Lodestar"
|
|
},
|
|
"affects": {
|
|
"vendor": {
|
|
"vendor_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"product": {
|
|
"product_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"product_name": "lodestar",
|
|
"version": {
|
|
"version_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"version_value": "< 0.36.0"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"vendor_name": "ChainSafe"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"data_format": "MITRE",
|
|
"data_type": "CVE",
|
|
"data_version": "4.0",
|
|
"description": {
|
|
"description_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "eng",
|
|
"value": "Lodestar is a TypeScript implementation of the Ethereum Consensus specification. Prior to version 0.36.0, there is a possible consensus split given maliciously-crafted `AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` being included on-chain. Because the developers represent `uint64` values as native javascript `number`s, there is an issue when those variables with large (greater than 2^53) `uint64` values are included on chain. In those cases, Lodestar may view valid_`AttesterSlashing` or `ProposerSlashing` as invalid, due to rounding errors in large `number` values. This causes a consensus split, where Lodestar nodes are forked away from the main network. Similarly, Lodestar may consider invalid `ProposerSlashing` as valid, thus including in proposed blocks that will be considered invalid by the network. Version 0.36.0 contains a fix for this issue. As a workaround, use `BigInt` to represent `Slot` and `Epoch` values in `AttesterSlashing` and `ProposerSlashing` objects. `BigInt` is too slow to be used in all `Slot` and `Epoch` cases, so one may carefully use `BigInt` just where necessary for consensus."
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"impact": {
|
|
"cvss": {
|
|
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
|
|
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
|
|
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
|
|
"baseScore": 7.5,
|
|
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
|
|
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
|
|
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
|
|
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
|
|
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
|
|
"userInteraction": "NONE",
|
|
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
|
|
"version": "3.1"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"problemtype": {
|
|
"problemtype_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"description": [
|
|
{
|
|
"lang": "eng",
|
|
"value": "CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"references": {
|
|
"reference_data": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
|
|
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977",
|
|
"refsource": "MISC",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0",
|
|
"refsource": "MISC",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"source": {
|
|
"advisory": "GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9",
|
|
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"adp": [
|
|
{
|
|
"providerMetadata": {
|
|
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
|
|
"shortName": "CVE",
|
|
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T06:17:54.286Z"
|
|
},
|
|
"title": "CVE Program Container",
|
|
"references": [
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_CONFIRM",
|
|
"x_transferred"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/security/advisories/GHSA-cvj7-5f3c-9vg9"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_MISC",
|
|
"x_transferred"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/pull/3977"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"tags": [
|
|
"x_refsource_MISC",
|
|
"x_transferred"
|
|
],
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/ChainSafe/lodestar/releases/tag/v0.36.0"
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"metrics": [
|
|
{
|
|
"other": {
|
|
"type": "ssvc",
|
|
"content": {
|
|
"timestamp": "2025-04-23T15:54:48.726800Z",
|
|
"id": "CVE-2022-29219",
|
|
"options": [
|
|
{
|
|
"Exploitation": "none"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"Automatable": "yes"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"Technical Impact": "partial"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
|
|
"version": "2.0.3"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment",
|
|
"providerMetadata": {
|
|
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
|
|
"shortName": "CISA-ADP",
|
|
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:22:36.298Z"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"cveMetadata": {
|
|
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
|
|
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
|
|
"cveId": "CVE-2022-29219",
|
|
"datePublished": "2022-05-24T14:15:14.000Z",
|
|
"dateReserved": "2022-04-13T00:00:00.000Z",
|
|
"dateUpdated": "2025-04-23T18:22:36.298Z",
|
|
"state": "PUBLISHED"
|
|
},
|
|
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
|
|
"dataVersion": "5.1"
|
|
} |